↓ Skip to main content

Obesity – a risk factor for postoperative complications in general surgery?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity – a risk factor for postoperative complications in general surgery?
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12871-015-0096-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elke E.K.M. Tjeertes, Sanne S.E. Hoeks, Sabine S.B.J.C. Beks, Tabita T.M. Valentijn, Anton A.G.M. Hoofwijk, Robert Jan R.J. Stolker

Abstract

Obesity is generally believed to be a risk factor for the development of postoperative complications. Although being obese is associated with medical hazards, recent literature shows no convincing data to support this assumption. Moreover a paradox between body mass index and survival is described. This study was designed to determine influence of body mass index on postoperative complications and long-term survival after surgery. A single-centre prospective analysis of postoperative complications in 4293 patients undergoing general surgery was conducted, with a median follow-up time of 6.3 years. We analyzed the impact of bodyweight on postoperative morbidity and mortality, using univariate and multivariate regression models. The obese had more concomitant diseases, increased risk of wound infection, greater intraoperative blood loss and a longer operation time. Being underweight was associated with a higher risk of complications, although not significant in adjusted analysis. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that underweight patients had worse outcome (HR 2.1; 95 % CI 1.4-3.0), whereas being overweight (HR 0.6; 95 % CI 0.5-0.8) or obese (HR 0.7; 95 % CI 0.6-0.9) was associated with improved survival. Obesity alone is a significant risk factor for wound infection, more surgical blood loss and a longer operation time. Being obese is associated with improved long-term survival, validating the obesity paradox. We also found that complication and mortality rates are significantly worse for underweight patients. Our findings suggest that a tendency to regard obesity as a major risk factor in general surgery is not justified. It is the underweight patient who is most at risk of major postoperative complications, including long-term mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Student > Master 26 11%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 64 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 82 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,225,577
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#149
of 1,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,841
of 263,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.