You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proliferating mesodermal cells in murine embryos exhibiting macrophage and lymphendothelial characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Developmental Biology, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-213x-8-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerstin Buttler, Taichi Ezaki, Jörg Wilting |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 32% |
| Researcher | 11 | 30% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,177,584
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#67
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,720
of 81,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them