↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and safety of plum-blossom needle therapy for Tourette syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness and safety of plum-blossom needle therapy for Tourette syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0873-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinna Yu, Yongming Ye, Shanshan Li, Jun Liu, Yanbing Zhai, Min Zhang, Zhishun Liu

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that acupuncture can alleviate the symptoms of Tourette syndrome (TS), but the evidence is insufficient. So far, there have been no reports on plum-blossom needle therapy for TS. Here we present a protocol for a randomized controlled trial using plum-blossom needle therapy to treat TS. Sixty patients will be randomly allocated into either the plum-blossom needle therapy group or the habit reversal training (HRT) group. All patients in each group will be given 12 weeks of treatment, with follow-up at the 24th week. The primary outcome measure will be the mean change from baseline in the total tic score on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) at the 12th week. Secondary outcome measures will include the scores on the TS Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) and the mean changes from baseline in the YGTSS score and the Children and Adolescents' Quality of Life Scale (CAQOL) at other time points. Safety will also be evaluated. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of plum-blossom needle therapy for TS compared with HRT. A limitation of this trial is that patients and acupuncturists cannot be blinded. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02403258 (Date of registration: March 31, 2015).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%