↓ Skip to main content

The BisPCR2 method for targeted bisulfite sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The BisPCR2 method for targeted bisulfite sequencing
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13072-015-0020-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana L Bernstein, Vasumathi Kameswaran, John E Le Lay, Karyn L Sheaffer, Klaus H Kaestner

Abstract

DNA methylation has emerged as an important regulator of development and disease, necessitating the design of more efficient and cost-effective methods for detecting and quantifying this epigenetic modification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques offer single base resolution of CpG methylation levels with high statistical significance, but are also high cost if performed genome-wide. Here, we describe a simplified targeted bisulfite sequencing approach in which DNA sequencing libraries are prepared following sodium bisulfite conversion and two rounds of PCR for target enrichment and sample barcoding, termed BisPCR(2). We have applied the BisPCR(2) technique to validate differential methylation at several type 2 diabetes risk loci identified in genome-wide studies of human islets. We confirmed some previous findings while not others, in addition to identifying novel differentially methylated CpGs at these genes of interest, due to the much higher depth of sequencing coverage in BisPCR(2) compared to prior array-based approaches. This study presents a robust, efficient, and cost-effective technique for targeted bisulfite NGS, and illustrates its utility by reanalysis of prior findings from genome-wide studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 28%
Researcher 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,727,070
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#137
of 566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,969
of 264,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.