You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Positive spill‐over effects of ART scale up on wider health systems development: evidence from Ethiopia and Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International AIDS Society, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-2652-14-s1-s3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Freya Rasschaert, Marjan Pirard, Mit P Philips, Rifat Atun, Edwin Wouters, Yibeltal Assefa, Bart Criel, Erik J Schouten, Wim Van Damme |
| Abstract |
Global health initiatives have enabled the scale up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) over recent years. The impact of HIV-specific funds and programmes on non-HIV-related health services and health systems in genera has been debated extensively. Drawing on evidence from Malawi and Ethiopia, this article analyses the effects of ART scale-up interventions on human resources policies, service delivery and general health outcomes, and explores how synergies can be maximized. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 125% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 22% |
| Researcher | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International AIDS Society
#1,572
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,319
of 127,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International AIDS Society
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.