↓ Skip to main content

Burden of chronic kidney disease on the African continent: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Burden of chronic kidney disease on the African continent: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Nephrology, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12882-018-0930-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnaud D. Kaze, Titilayo Ilori, Bernard G. Jaar, Justin B. Echouffo-Tcheugui

Abstract

Accurate contemporary data on the burden of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on the African continent are lacking. We determined the prevalence of CKD in adult populations living in Africa, and variations by stage, gender, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) equation, and residence. For this systematic review, we searched multiple electronic databases for original studies on CKD prevalence reported from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2016. Two reviewers independently undertook quality assessment and data extraction. We stabilized the variance of study-specific estimates with the Freeman-Turkey single arcsine transformation and pooled the data using a random effects meta-analysis models. A total of 98 studies involving 98,432 individuals were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall prevalence was 15.8% (95% CI 12.1-19.9) for CKD stages 1-5 and 4.6% (3.3-6.1) for CKD stages 3-5 in the general population. Equivalent figures were greater at 32.3% (23.4-41.8) and 13.3% (10.7-16.0) in high-risk populations (people with hypertension, diabetes, HIV). CKD prevalence was higher in studies based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula than MDRD or CKD-EPI equations; and in studies from sub-Saharan Africa compared with those from North Africa (17.7, 95% CI 13.7-22.1 vs 6.1, 95% CI 3.6-9.3, p < 0.001). There was substantial heterogeneity across studies (all I2 > 90%) and no evidence of publication bias in main analyses. CKD is highly prevalent across Africa, inviting efforts into prevention, early detection and control of CKD in adults living on the African continent which is particularly important in a resource limited environment. Prospero Registration ID: CRD42017054445 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 488 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 17%
Student > Postgraduate 50 10%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Researcher 29 6%
Other 24 5%
Other 74 15%
Unknown 183 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 3%
Unspecified 14 3%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 192 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,091,734
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#439
of 2,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,783
of 334,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.