↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0579-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Wang, Zhen Wei, He Wang, Zeyu Jiang, Ziwen Peng

Abstract

The Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) is originally developed by the Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group and has been translated into several languages. This paper is aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) in both clinical and non-clinical samples. Five hundred and sixty-nine undergraduate volunteers and sixty-six OCD patients were included in the study. All participants have completed Chinese version of OBQ-44, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the construct validity of Chinese version of OBQ-44. The internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities at 4-week interval were examined in both non-clinical and clinical groups. The confirmatory factor analysis of the non-clinical sample confirmed a 3-factor model which was suggested by the original authors of the instrument (χ (2)/d.f = 2.96, GFI = 0.83, NFI = 0.82, CFI = 0.88 and RMSEA = 0.06). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were at an acceptable range for the two samples. The Chinese version of OBQ-44 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing dysfunctional beliefs related to the etiology and maintenance of obsessions and compulsions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 31%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%