Comparison of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography under moderate sedation for guiding transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Ines Sherifi, Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar, Mithun Varghese, Menachem Weiner, Ani Anyanwu, Jason C. Kovacic, Samin Sharma, Annapoorna Kini, Partho P. Sengupta

The optimal periprocedural imaging strategy during transcathether aortic valve replacement (TAVR) performed under moderate sedation is debated. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) provides suboptimal views due to poorer resolution and patient positioning, whereas use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) under moderate sedation is not widely utilized. The aim of our study was to compare the value of TTE in comparison with TEE guidance under moderate sedation during TAVR. The study population included 144 consecutive patients (mean age 83±11 years, 78(54%) females) who had TAVR under moderate sedation using either a TTE (n=96) or TEE (n=48). We compared procedural outcomes using propensity score matching. There were no significant inter-group differences in age, sex, ejection fraction, aortic valve area, pressure gradients, creatinine or type of valve used. The procedural time was significantly shorter in the TEE group (p < 0.001) and associated with a lower need for periprocedural aortograms (7.7±1.9 vs. 8.2±1.9, p=0.022) and a lower occurrence of acute kidney injury (1 vs. 11, p=0.047). The 1:1 propensity score matching also showed a lower procedural time (p=0.032), number of aortograms (p = 0.014) and a trend towards lower acute kidney injury in the TEE group (p=0.077). TAVR guidance using TEE is associated with a lower fluoroscopic time, a lower need for additional aortograms and trend in lower occurrence of post-TAVR acute kidney injury.