↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Brave new epigenomes: the dawn of epigenetic engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Brave new epigenomes: the dawn of epigenetic engineering
Published in
Genome Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13073-015-0194-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Köferle, Stefan H Stricker, Stephan Beck

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13073-015-0185-8.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,002,231
of 24,068,839 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,178
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,240
of 268,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,068,839 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.