↓ Skip to main content

Use of vitamin K antagonists for secondary stroke prevention depends on the treating healthcare provider in Germany – results from the German AFNET registry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of vitamin K antagonists for secondary stroke prevention depends on the treating healthcare provider in Germany – results from the German AFNET registry
Published in
BMC Neurology, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0371-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl Georg Haeusler, Andrea Gerth, Tobias Limbourg, Ulrich Tebbe, Michael Oeff, Karl Wegscheider, András Treszl, Ursula Ravens, Thomas Meinertz, Paulus Kirchhof, Günter Breithardt, Gerhard Steinbeck, Michael Nabauer

Abstract

Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is recommended by guidelines. The German Competence NETwork on Atrial Fibrillation established a nationwide prospective registry including 9,574 AF patients, providing the opportunity to analyse AF management according to German healthcare providers. On enrolment, 896 (9.4 %) patients reported a prior ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Stroke patients were significantly older, more likely to be female, had a higher rate of cardiovascular risk factors, and more frequently received anticoagulation (almost exclusively VKA) than patients without prior stroke history. Following enrolment, 76.4 % of all stroke patients without VKA contraindications received anticoagulation, which inversely associated with age (OR 0.95 per year; 95 % CI 0.92-0.97). General practitioners/internists (OR 0.40; 95 % CI 0.21-0.77) and physicians working in regional hospitals (OR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29-0.77) prescribed anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention less frequently than physicians working at university hospitals (reference) and office-based cardiologists (OR 1.40; 95 % CI 0.76-2.60). The impact of the treating healthcare provider was less evident in registry patients without prior stroke. In the AFNET registry, anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention was prescribed in roughly three-quarters of AF patients, a significantly higher rate than in primary prevention. We identified two factors associated with withholding oral anticoagulation in stroke survivors, namely higher age and-most prominently-treatment by a general practitioner/internist or physicians working at regional hospitals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Librarian 5 8%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Psychology 4 6%
Mathematics 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 20 30%