↓ Skip to main content

Identifying children with excess malaria episodes after adjusting for variation in exposure: identification from a longitudinal study using statistical count models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying children with excess malaria episodes after adjusting for variation in exposure: identification from a longitudinal study using statistical count models
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0422-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis Maina Ndungu, Kevin Marsh, Gregory Fegan, Juliana Wambua, George Nyangweso, Edna Ogada, Tabitha Mwangi, Chris Nyundo, Alex Macharia, Sophie Uyoga, Thomas N Williams, Philip Bejon

Abstract

The distribution of Plasmodium falciparum clinical malaria episodes is over-dispersed among children in endemic areas, with more children experiencing multiple clinical episodes than would be expected based on a Poisson distribution. There is consistent evidence for micro-epidemiological variation in exposure to P. falciparum. The aim of the current study was to identify children with excess malaria episodes after controlling for malaria exposure. We selected the model that best fit the data out of the models examined and included the following covariates: age, a weighted local prevalence of infection as an index of exposure, and calendar time to predict episodes of malaria on active surveillance malaria data from 2,463 children of under 15 years of age followed for between 5 and 15 years each. Using parameters from the zero-inflated negative binomial model which best fitted our data, we ran 100 simulations of the model based on our population to determine the variation that might be seen due to chance. We identified 212 out of 2,463 children who had a number of clinical episodes above the 95(th) percentile of the simulations run from the model, hereafter referred to as "excess malaria (EM)". We then identified exposure-matched controls with "average numbers of malaria" episodes, and found that the EM group had higher parasite densities when asymptomatically infected or during clinical malaria, and were less likely to be of haemoglobin AS genotype. Of the models tested, the negative zero-inflated negative binomial distribution with exposure, calendar year, and age acting as independent predictors, fitted the distribution of clinical malaria the best. Despite accounting for these factors, a group of children suffer excess malaria episodes beyond those predicted by the model. An epidemiological framework for identifying these children will allow us to study factors that may explain excess malaria episodes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2015.
All research outputs
#12,814,219
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,702
of 3,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,975
of 264,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#69
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.