↓ Skip to main content

Nine weeks of supplementation with a multi-nutrient product augments gains in lean mass, strength, and muscular performance in resistance trained men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nine weeks of supplementation with a multi-nutrient product augments gains in lean mass, strength, and muscular performance in resistance trained men
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-7-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen M Schmitz, Jennifer E Hofheins, Robert Lemieux

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of supplementation with Gaspari Nutrition's SOmaxP Maximum Performance™ (SOmaxP) versus a comparator product (CP) containing an equal amount of creatine (4 g), carbohydrate (39 g maltodextrin), and protein (7 g whey protein hydrolysate) on muscular strength, muscular endurance, and body composition during nine weeks of intense resistance training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 19 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,313,748
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#313
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,117
of 436,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#307
of 853 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 853 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.