↓ Skip to main content

A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2163-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Kaltenbrunner, Lars Bengtsson, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Maria Engström

Abstract

During the past decade, the concept of Lean has spread rapidly within the healthcare sector, but there is a lack of instruments that can measure staff's perceptions of Lean adoption. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop a questionnaire measuring Lean in healthcare, based on Liker's description of Lean, by adapting an existing instrument developed for the service sector. A mixed-method design was used. Initially, items from the service sector instrument were categorized according to Liker's 14 principles describing Lean within four domains: philosophy, processes, people and partners and problem-solving. Items were lacking for three of Liker's principles and were therefore developed de novo. Think-aloud interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare staff from different professions to contextualize and examine the face validity of the questionnaire prototype. Thereafter, the adjusted questionnaire's psychometric properties were assessed on the basis of a cross-sectional survey among 386 staff working in primary care. The think-aloud interviews led to adjustments in the questionnaire to better suit a healthcare context, and the number of items was reduced. Confirmatory factor analysis of the adjusted questionnaire showed a generally acceptable correspondence with Liker's description of Lean. Internal consistency, measured using Cronbach's alpha, for the factors in Liker's description of Lean was 0.60 for the factor people and partners, and over 0.70 for the three other factors. Test-retest reliability measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 for the four factors. We designed a questionnaire capturing staff's perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare on the basis of Liker's description. This Lean in Healthcare Questionnaire (LiHcQ) showed generally acceptable psychometric properties, which supports its usability for measuring Lean adoption in healthcare. We suggest that further research focus on verifying the usability of LiHcQ in other healthcare settings, and on adjusting the instrument if needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 54 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 19 12%
Engineering 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 61 40%