You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inbreeding depression in red deer calves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-11-318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Craig A Walling, Daniel H Nussey, Alison Morris, Tim H Clutton-Brock, Loeske EB Kruuk, Josephine M Pemberton |
| Abstract |
Understanding the fitness consequences of inbreeding is of major importance for evolutionary and conservation biology. However, there are few studies using pedigree-based estimates of inbreeding or investigating the influence of environment and age variation on inbreeding depression in natural populations. Here we investigated the consequences of variation in inbreeding coefficient for three juvenile traits, birth date, birth weight and first year survival, in a wild population of red deer, considering both calf and mother's inbreeding coefficient. We also tested whether inbreeding depression varied with environmental conditions and maternal age. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 124 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,554
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,917
of 153,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#44
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.