↓ Skip to main content

Hypothesis: Neuroendocrine Mechanisms (Hypothalamus-Growth Hormone-STAT5 Axis) Contribute to Sex Bias in Pulmonary Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypothesis: Neuroendocrine Mechanisms (Hypothalamus-Growth Hormone-STAT5 Axis) Contribute to Sex Bias in Pulmonary Hypertension
Published in
Molecular Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2015.00122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pravin B. Sehgal, Yang-Ming Yang, Edmund J. Miller

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and hereditary pulmonary arterial hypertension (HPAH) is approximately 2-4-fold higher in women than in men. Paradoxically, there is an opposite male bias in typical rodent models of PH (chronic hypoxia or monocrotaline); in these models administration of estrogenic compounds [e.g. estradiol-17β (E2)] is protective. Further complexities are observed in humans ingesting anorexigens (female bias), and in rodent models such as after hypoxia plus SU5416/Sugen (little sex bias) or involving serotonin transporter overexpression or dexfenfluramine administration (female bias). These complexities in sex bias in PH remain incompletely understood. We recently discovered that conditional deletion of STAT5a/b in vascular smooth muscle cells abrogated the male bias in PH in hypoxic mice, and that late-stage obliterative lesions in patients of both sexes with IPAH and HPAH showed reduced STAT5a/b, reduced Tyr-P-STAT5 and reduced BCL6. In trying to understand the significance of these observations we realized that there existed a well-characterized E2-sensitive central neuroendocrine mechanism of sex bias, studied over the last 40 years, that, at its peripheral end, culminated in species-specific male ("pulsatile") vs female ("more continuous") temporal patterns of circulating growth hormone (GH) levels leading to male vs female patterned activation of STAT5a/b in peripheral tissues, and thus sex-biased expression of hundreds of genes. In this essay we consider the contribution of this neuroendocrine mechanism (hypothalamus-GH-STAT5) in the generation of sex bias in different PH situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,286,650
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#999
of 1,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,839
of 263,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.