You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-015-0172-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krishna S. Nayak, Jon-Fredrik Nielsen, Matt A. Bernstein, Michael Markl, Peter D. Gatehouse, Rene M. Botnar, David Saloner, Christine Lorenz, Han Wen, Bob S. Hu, Frederick H. Epstein, John N. Oshinski, Subha V. Raman |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) phase contrast imaging has undergone a wide range of changes with the development and availability of improved calibration procedures, visualization tools, and analysis methods. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art in CMR phase contrast imaging methodology, clinical applications including summaries of past clinical performance, and emerging research and clinical applications that utilize today's latest technology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 52% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 305 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 20% |
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 20% |
| Unknown | 65 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 35% |
| Engineering | 68 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 87 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,471,481
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#111
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,776
of 276,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.