↓ Skip to main content

Development of a novel imaging system for cell therapy in the brain

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a novel imaging system for cell therapy in the brain
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0129-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria-Adelaide Micci, Debbie R. Boone, Margaret A. Parsley, Jingna Wei, Igor Patrikeev, Massoud Motamedi, Helen L. Hellmich

Abstract

Stem cells have been evaluated as a potential therapeutic approach for several neurological disorders of the central and peripheral nervous system as well as for traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Currently, the lack of a reliable and safe method to accurately and non-invasively locate the site of implantation and track the migration of stem cells in vivo hampers the development of stem cell therapy and its clinical application. In this report, we present data that demonstrate the feasibility of using the human sodium-iodide symporter (hNIS) as a reporter gene for tracking neural stem cell (NSC) after transplantation in the brain using SPECT/CT imaging. Neural stem cells were isolated from the hippocampus of adult rats (Hipp-NSC) and transduced with a lentiviral vector containing the hNIS gene. Hipp-NSC expressing the hNIS (NIS-Hipp-NSC) were characterized in vitro and in vivo after transplantation in the rat brain and imaged using technetium 99 m ((99m)Tc) and a small rodent SPECT/CT apparatus. Comparisons were made between Hipp-NSC and NIS-Hipp-NSC, and statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student's t test. Our results show that the expression of the hNIS allows for the repeated visualization of NSC in vivo in the brain using SPECT/CT imaging and it does not affect the ability of Hipp-NSC to generate neuronal and glial cells in vitro and in vivo. These data support the use of the hNIS as a reporter gene for non-invasive imaging of NSC in the brain. The repeated, non-invasive tracking of implanted cells will accelerate the development of effective stem cell therapies for TBI and other types of central nervous system injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 20%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,342,608
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,342
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,290
of 264,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.