↓ Skip to main content

Position of draining venous cannula in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory and respiratory/circulatory support in adult patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Position of draining venous cannula in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory and respiratory/circulatory support in adult patients
Published in
Critical Care, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-2083-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Frenckner, M. Broman, M. Broomé

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used in critically ill patients with severe pulmonary and/or cardiac failure. Blood is drained from the venous system and pumped through a membrane oxygenator where it is oxygenated. For pulmonary support, the blood is returned to the patient via a vein (veno-venous ECMO) and for pulmonary/circulatory support it is returned via an artery (veno-arterial ECMO).Veno-venous ECMO can be performed either with a single dual-lumen cannula or with two separate single-lumen cannulas. If the latter is chosen, flow direction can either be from the inferior caval vein (IVC) to the right atrium or the opposite. Earlier research has shown that drainage from the IVC yields less recirculation and therefore the IVC to right atrium route has become the standard in most centers for veno-venous ECMO with two cannulas. However, recent research has shown that recirculation can be minimized using a multistage draining cannula in the optimal position inserted via the right internal jugular vein and with blood return to the femoral vein. The clinical results with this route are excellent.In veno-arterial ECMO the most common site for blood infusion is the femoral artery. If venous blood is drained from the IVC, the patient is at risk of developing a dual circulation (Harlequin syndrome, North-South syndrome, differential oxygenation) meaning a poor oxygenation of the upper part of the body, while the lower part has excellent oxygenation. By instead draining from the superior caval vein (SVC) via a multistage cannula inserted in the right internal jugular vein this risk is neutralized.In conclusion, the authors argue that draining blood from the SVC and right atrium via a multistage cannula inserted in the right internal jugular vein is equal or better than IVC drainage both in veno-venous two cannula ECMO and in veno-arterial ECMO with blood return to the femoral artery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 20%
Researcher 13 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,359,918
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,145
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,395
of 342,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#32
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.