↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study on the availability of modern contraceptives in public and private health facilities in a peri-urban community in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative study on the availability of modern contraceptives in public and private health facilities in a peri-urban community in Ghana
Published in
Reproductive Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12978-015-0058-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwame K. Adjei, Amos K Laar, Clement T. Narh, Martha A. Abdulai, Sam Newton, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Sam Adjei

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa reports low use of family planning methods and high unmet need. Availability of these methods is one of the major barriers to contraceptive use in the region. This study determined the availability of modern contraceptives and perceived factors affecting this in health facilities in the Ga East municipality of Ghana. This was a cross-sectional study involving quantitative and qualitative techniques. Data was obtained from 51 randomly selected health facilities using a checklist. Relationships between certain attributes of the facilities and availability of each category of contraceptive identified was tested using univariate and and multiple logistic regression techniques. The qualitative data was obtained by conducting in-depth interviews with the managers of the facilities and then analysed according to emerging themes. The study gave an indication that there was a low availability of long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) such as implants (14 %) and IUDs (14 %) in the health facilities. Male condoms (78 %) and combined oral contraceptives (82 %) were the most available At the bivariate level, emergency contraceptives were less likely to be found in public health facilities (OR = 0.11, p = 0.05). Facility managers cited 'profit' and 'preference' as some of the reasons for availability of their contraceptives. Availability of modern contraceptives differ according to the type and brand of contraceptive. There is however a low availability of LARC methods in all the health facilities. Factors such as 'profit' accounted for the low availability of this method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 25%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 17%
Social Sciences 28 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 63 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,080
of 1,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,608
of 275,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.