You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0301-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Milat, Adrian Bauman, Sally Redman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| Canada | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 80 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 19% |
| Unknown | 89 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 73 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 13% |
| Psychology | 22 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 77 | 19% |
| Unknown | 106 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,897,280
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#352
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,669
of 277,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.