↓ Skip to main content

Glycine propionyl-L-carnitine increases plasma nitrate/nitrite in resistance trained men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glycine propionyl-L-carnitine increases plasma nitrate/nitrite in resistance trained men
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-4-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J Bloomer, Webb A Smith, Kelsey H Fisher-Wellman

Abstract

: We have recently demonstrated that oral intake of glycine propionyl-L-carnitine (GPLC) increases plasma nitrate/nitrite (NOx), a surrogate measure of nitric oxide production. However, these findings were observed at rest, and in previously sedentary subjects. In the present study, we sought to determine the impact of oral GPLC on plasma NOx at rest and in response to a period of reactive hyperemia in resistance trained men. Using a double blind, crossover design, 15 healthy men (24 +/- 4 years) were assigned to GPLC (3 g/d PLC + 1044 mg glycine) and a placebo in random order, for a four-week period, with a two-week washout between condition assignment. Blood samples were taken from subjects at rest and at 0, 3, and 10 minutes following an ischemia-reperfusion protocol (six minutes of upper arm cuff occlusion at 200 mmHg followed by rapid reperfusion with cuff removal). Blood samples were taken from a forearm vein from the same arm used for the protocol and analyzed for total nitrate/nitrite. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM. A condition main effect (p = 0.0008) was noted for NOx, with higher values in subjects when using GPLC (45.6 +/- 2.8 mumol.L-1) compared to placebo (34.9 +/- 1.2 mumol.L-1). No time main effect was noted (p = 0.7099), although values increased approximately 12% from rest (37.7 +/- 2.7 mumol.L-1) to a peak at 10 minutes post protocol (42.3 +/- 3.3 mumol.L-1). The interaction effect was not significant (p = 0.8809), although paired time contrasts revealed higher values for GPLC compared to placebo at 3 (48.2 +/- 6.7 vs. 34.9 +/- 2.4 mumol.L-1; p = 0.033) and 10 (48.8 +/- 5.9 vs. 35.7 +/- 2.1 mumol.L-1; p = 0.036) minutes post protocol, with non-statistically significant differences noted at rest (41.8 +/- 4.5 vs. 33.6 +/- 2.5 mumol.L-1; p = 0.189) and at 0 minutes (43.6 +/- 5.1 vs. 35.4 +/- 2.7 mumol.L-1; p = 0.187) post protocol. An analysis by subject (collapsed across time) indicated that 11 of the 15 subjects experienced an increase in NOx with GPLC treatment. These findings indicate that short-term oral GPLC supplementation can increase NOx in resistance trained men. However, as with many dietary supplements, there exist both "responders" and "non-responders" to treatment. Future work may focus on the mechanisms for the discrepancy in response to GPLC supplementation for purposes of NOx elevation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,374,315
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#444
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,910
of 437,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#433
of 854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.