You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clustering and correlates of screen-time and eating behaviours among young children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-5698-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Pearson, Stuart J. H. Biddle, Paula Griffiths, Julie P. Johnston, Emma Haycraft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 46% |
| Ireland | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 17% |
| Psychology | 19 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,953,354
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,302
of 17,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,597
of 344,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#59
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.