↓ Skip to main content

Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Hajna, Nancy A. Ross, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Patrick Bélisle, Lawrence Joseph, Kaberi Dasgupta

Abstract

Higher street connectivity, land use mix and residential density (collectively referred to as neighbourhood walkability) have been linked to higher levels of walking. The objective of our study was to summarize the current body of knowledge on the association between neighbourhood walkability and biosensor-assessed daily steps in adults. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase (Ovid) for articles published prior to May 2014 on the association between walkability (based on Geographic Information Systems-derived street connectivity, land use mix, and/or residential density) and daily steps (pedometer or accelerometer-assessed) in adults. The mean differences in daily steps between adults living in high versus low walkable neighbourhoods were pooled across studies using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The search strategy yielded 8,744 unique abstracts. Thirty of these underwent full article review of which six met the inclusion criteria. Four of these studies were conducted in Europe and two were conducted in Asia. A meta-analysis of four of these six studies indicates that participants living in high compared to low walkable neighbourhoods accumulate 766 more steps per day (95 % credible interval 250, 1271). This accounts for approximately 8 % of recommended daily steps. The results of European and Asian studies support the hypothesis that higher neighbourhood walkability is associated with higher levels of biosensor-assessed walking in adults. More studies on this association are needed in North America.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 21%
Student > Master 37 16%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 15%
Social Sciences 29 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Engineering 15 6%
Environmental Science 14 6%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 73 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,475,521
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,881
of 16,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,181
of 270,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#47
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.