↓ Skip to main content

What’s new in pontocerebellar hypoplasia? An update on genes and subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What’s new in pontocerebellar hypoplasia? An update on genes and subtypes
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13023-018-0826-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tessa van Dijk, Frank Baas, Peter G. Barth, Bwee Tien Poll-The

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 50 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 53 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,090
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,305
of 344,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#34
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.