↓ Skip to main content

Noisy splicing, more than expression regulation, explains why some exons are subject to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noisy splicing, more than expression regulation, explains why some exons are subject to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay
Published in
BMC Biology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-7-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenguo Zhang, Dedong Xin, Ping Wang, Li Zhou, Landian Hu, Xiangyin Kong, Laurence D Hurst

Abstract

Nonsense-mediated decay is a mechanism that degrades mRNAs with a premature termination codon. That some exons have premature termination codons at fixation is paradoxical: why make a transcript if it is only to be destroyed? One model supposes that splicing is inherently noisy and spurious transcripts are common. The evolution of a premature termination codon in a regularly made unwanted transcript can be a means to prevent costly translation. Alternatively, nonsense-mediated decay can be regulated under certain conditions so the presence of a premature termination codon can be a means to up-regulate transcripts needed when nonsense-mediated decay is suppressed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 33%
Researcher 29 28%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 14 13%