You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RNA-Seq reveals genotype-specific molecular responses to water deficit in eucalyptus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-538 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilie Villar, Christophe Klopp, Céline Noirot, Evandro Novaes, Matias Kirst, Christophe Plomion, Jean-Marc Gion |
| Abstract |
In a context of climate change, phenotypic plasticity provides long-lived species, such as trees, with the means to adapt to environmental variations occurring within a single generation. In eucalyptus plantations, water availability is a key factor limiting productivity. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptation of eucalyptus to water shortage remain unclear. In this study, we compared the molecular responses of two commercial eucalyptus hybrids during the dry season. Both hybrids differ in productivity when grown under water deficit. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 186 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,657
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,461
of 141,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#64
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.