↓ Skip to main content

The burden among family caregivers of elderly cancer patients: prospective study in a Moroccan population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The burden among family caregivers of elderly cancer patients: prospective study in a Moroccan population
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1307-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sihame Lkhoyaali, Meryem Ait El Haj, Fadwa El Omrani, Mohammed Layachi, Nabil Ismaili, Hind Mrabti, Hassan Errihani

Abstract

In Morocco, families play a major role in caring for elderly cancer patients. We conducted a prospective descriptive study, in the National Institute of Oncology in Morocco. The study aimed to include family members who are caregivers for patients aged ≥70 years old. After obtaining IRB approval, a total of 150 caregivers responded to the questionnaire. Mean age was 44.7 years. The majority were females (59.3%), living in urban areas (66.7%), and educated (62.7%).Offspring (sons or daughters) represented 56.7, 54% lived with their relatives in the same house. Most of the participants were married and have familial responsibilities. In relatives, anxiety was found in 79.3%, it was related to fear of losing the patient in 57% and resulted in the use of anxiolytics in 10%. Guilt feeling towards patients regarding neglecting their early symptoms was reported in 38%. Depression and anxiety were more frequent among female relatives and among those of urban origin. Obsession of dying from cancer was present in about 30% and fear of contagion was more common among those from rural areas and illiterate. Economic resources were exceeded in 78.7 and 56% have used banking credits, and sale of properties. Work lay-off was recorded in 54%. Relatives participated in treatment making decisions in 86% of patients. Even there was a great impact on elderly cancerous patients relatives, the benefits of caregiving was observed in 80%. More studies have to be conducted, especially in developing countries where the lack of resources majors the impact on family caregivers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Other 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 20%
Psychology 13 13%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,183,132
of 24,529,782 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,335
of 4,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,987
of 269,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#35
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,529,782 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.