↓ Skip to main content

A pilot and comparative study between pathological and serological levels of immunoglobulin and complement among three kinds of primary glomerulonephritis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Immunology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pilot and comparative study between pathological and serological levels of immunoglobulin and complement among three kinds of primary glomerulonephritis
Published in
BMC Immunology, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12865-018-0254-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Dong, Tianhao Peng, Jing Gao, Xingwang Jia, Guangtao Yan, Yong Wang

Abstract

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), membranous nephropathy (MN) and minimal-change disease (MCD) are three common types of glomerulonephritis in China. Pathological diagnosis based on renal biopsy is the criterion and the golden standard for diagnosing the sub-types of primary or secondary glomerulonephritis. Immunoglobulin and complements might be used in the differential diagnosis of glomerulonephritis without renal biopsies. However, the relationship between IF intensities of immune proteins and the corresponding serum levels remained unclear, and seldom studies combine histopathological examination results and blood tests together for a predictive purpose. This study was considered as a pilot study for integrating histopathological indicators into serum parameters for exploring the relationship of IF intensity and serum values of immunoglobulin and complement, and for screening and investigating effective indicators inIgAN, MN and MCD. Renal tissue immunofluorescence (IF) intensity grades and serum levels of immunoglobulin and complements (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C4) were retrospectively analyzed in 236 cases with IgAN, MN or MCD. IF grades were grouped as negative (-), positive (+) or strong positive (++) with both high and low magnification of microscope. Other serum indicators such as urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crea) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also evaluated among the groups. There were difference in IgA, IgG and C3 IF intensity grades among IgAN, MN and MCD groups (p = 9.82E-43, 4.60E-39, 7.45E-15, respectively). Serum values of BUN, Crea, eGFR, IgG, IgA, IgM and C4 showed difference in three groups (BUN: p = 0.045, Crea: p = 3.45E-5, eGFR: p = 0.005, IgG: p = 1.68E-14, IgA: p = 9.14E-9, IgM: p = 0.014, C4: p = 0.026). eGFR had the trend to decrease with enhanced IgA IF positive grades (p = 8.99E-4); Crea had trends to decrease with both enhanced IgA and IgG IF intensity grades (p = 2.06E-6, 2.94E-5, respectively). In all subjects, serum IgA levels was inversely correlated with eGFR(r = - 0.216, p = 0.001) and correlated with Crea levels(r = 0.189, p = 0.004); serum IgG and Crea showed no correlation which were discordance with inverse correlation of IgG IF grade and Crea(r = 0.058,p = 0.379). IgG serum level was inverse correlated with its IF grades (p = 3.54E-5, p = 7.08E-6, respectively); C3 serum levels had significantly difference between Neg and positive (+) group (p = 0.0003). IgA serum level was positive correlated with its IF grades (Neg-(+): p = 0.0001; (+)-(++): p = 0.022; Neg-(++): p = 2.01E-10). After matching comparison among C3 groups, C3 Neg. group and C3 ++ group had difference (*p = 0.017). C4 had all negative IF expression in all pathological groups. In IgAN subjects, there were statistical differences of serum C3 levels between its pathological Neg and positive (+) group(p = 0.026), and serum IgA levels showed difference between IgA pathological positive(+) and (++)(p = 0.007). In MN subjects, sIgG levels showed difference between IgG pathological IF grade positive (+) and (++)(p = 0.044); serum C3 levels showed difference between C3 pathological IF grade Neg and positive(+)(p = 0.005); and serum IgA levels showed difference between Neg and positive(+)(p = 0.040). In IgAN, eGFR showed serum IgA levels had significant differences among groups (p = 0.007) and had increasing trend with enhanced its IF grades(Ptrend = 0.016). There were also difference between IgG group Neg and positive (+) (p = 0.005, Ptrend = 0.007) in IgAN. In MN, serum IgG levels had significant differences among IF groups (p = 0.034) and had decreasing trend with its enhanced IF grades (Ptrend = 0.014). Serum C3 concentrations also were found distinctive among IF groups (p = 0.016) and had in inverse correlation with its enhanced IF grades (Ptrend = 0.004). Our research cross contrasts several immunoprotein IF intensities and relevant serum levels in three kinds of primary glomerular nephritis, and finally acquired helpful results for understanding the relationships between pathological presentation and serological presentation of immunoproteins in kidney diseases. Furthermore, this pilot study is offering a possible method for the analysis of combination of pathology and serology. Different pathological types of nephritis presented different expression patterns of immunoglobulin and complement, especially IgA and IgG, which suggested different pathogenesis involved in the development of IgAN and MN. Furthermore, either in tissue or in serum, increased IgA level was closely related with renal function in all of the patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,536,861
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#327
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,412
of 328,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.