↓ Skip to main content

“A randomized, double-blind study of the effects of omega-3 fatty acids (Omegaven™) on outcome after major liver resection”

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“A randomized, double-blind study of the effects of omega-3 fatty acids (Omegaven™) on outcome after major liver resection”
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12876-015-0331-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Linecker, Perparim Limani, Florin Botea, Irinel Popescu, Ruslan Alikhanov, Michail Efanov, Pavel Kim, Igor Khatkov, Dimitri Aristotele Raptis, Christoph Tschuor, Beatrice Beck-Schimmer, John Bonvini, Andrea Wirsching, Philipp Kron, Ksenija Slankamenac, Bostjan Humar, Rolf Graf, Henrik Petrowsky, Pierre-Alain Clavien

Abstract

The body is dependent on the exogenous supply of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3-PUFA). These essential fatty acids are key players in regulating metabolic signaling but also exert anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic properties. The liver is a major metabolic organ involved in fatty acid metabolism. Under experimental conditions, n3-PUFA exert beneficial effect on hepatic steatosis, regeneration and inflammatory insults such as ischemic injury after surgery. Some of these effects have also been observed in human subjects. However, it is unclear whether perioperative administration of n3-PUFA is sufficient to protect the liver from ischemic injury. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing n3-PUFA (pre-) conditioning strategies in patients scheduled for liver surgery. The Omegaven™ trial is a multi-centric, double-blind, randomized, placebo- controlled trial applying two single doses of Omegaven™ or placebo on 258 patients undergoing major liver resection. Primary endpoints are morbidity and mortality one month after hospital discharge, defined by the Clavien- Dindo classification of surgical complications (Ann Surg 240(2):205-13, 2004) as well as the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (Ann Surg 258(1):1-7, 2013). Secondary outcome variables include length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital stay, postoperative liver function tests, fatty acid and eicosanoid concentration, inflammatory markers in serum and in liver tissue. An interim analysis is scheduled after the first 30 patients per randomization group. Long-term administration of n3-PUFA have a beneficial effect on metabolism and hepatic injury. Patients often require surgery without much delay, thus long-term n3-PUFA uptake is not possible. Also, lack of compliance may lead to incomplete n3-PUFA substitution. Hence, perioperative Omegaven™ may provide an easy and controllable way to ensure hepaative application of tic protection. ClinicalTrial.gov: ID: NCT01884948 , registered June 14, 2013; Institution Ethical Board Approval: KEK-ZH-Nr. 2010-0038; Swissmedic Notification: 2012DR3215.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,768,879
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,033
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,334
of 264,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#27
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.