↓ Skip to main content

Development of a high-field MR-guided HIFU setup for thermal and mechanical ablation methods in small animals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a high-field MR-guided HIFU setup for thermal and mechanical ablation methods in small animals
Published in
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40349-015-0035-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martijn Hoogenboom, Martinus J. van Amerongen, Dylan C. Eikelenboom, Melissa Wassink, Martijn H. den Brok, Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Erik Dumont, Gosse J. Adema, Arend Heerschap, Jurgen J. Fütterer

Abstract

Thermal and mechanical high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation techniques are in development for non-invasive treatment of cancer. However, knowledge of in vivo histopathologic and immunologic reactions after HIFU ablation is still limited. This study aims to create a setup for evaluation of different HIFU ablation methods in mouse tumors using high-field magnetic resonance (MR) guidance. An optimized MR-guided-HIFU setup could be used to increase knowledge of the different pathologic and immunologic reactions to different HIFU ablation methods. Three different HIFU treatment strategies were applied in mouse melanomas (B16): a thermal (continuous wave), a mechanical (5 ms pulsed wave), and an intermediate setting (20 ms pulsed wave) for HIFU ablation, all under MR guidance using a 7 tesla animal MR system. Histopathologic evaluation was performed 3 days after treatment. The focus of the ultrasound transducer could accurately be positioned within the tumor under MR image guidance, without substantial damage to the surrounding tissue and skin. All mice retained complete use of the treated leg after treatment. Temperatures of >60, <50, and <44 °C were reached during thermal, intermediate, and mechanical HIFU ablation, respectively. Thermal-treated tumors showed large regions of coagulative necrosis. Tumors of both the mechanical and intermediate groups showed fractionated tissue with islands of necrosis and some pseudocysts with hemorrhage. A stable small animal MR-guided HIFU setup was designed and evaluated for follow-up MR imaging and histopathologic responses of the treated tumors. This will facilitate further studies with a larger number of mice for detailed evaluation of the pathologic and immunologic response to different HIFU strategies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Poland 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#21,296,229
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#73
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,652
of 267,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.