↓ Skip to main content

Non-blood medical care in gynecologic oncology: a review and update of blood conservation management schemes

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-blood medical care in gynecologic oncology: a review and update of blood conservation management schemes
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-9-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Simou, Nikolaos Thomakos, Flora Zagouri, Antonios Vlysmas, Nikolaos Akrivos, Dimitrios Zacharakis, Christos A Papadimitriou, Meletios-Athanassios Dimopoulos, Alexandros Rodolakis, Aris Antsaklis

Abstract

This review attempts to outline the alternative measures and interventions used in bloodless surgery in the field of gynecologic oncology and demonstrate their effectiveness. Nowadays, as increasingly more patients are expressing their fears concerning the potential risks accompanying allogenic transfusion of blood products, putting the theory of bloodless surgery into practice seems to gaining greater acceptance. An increasing number of institutions appear to be successfully adopting approaches that minimize blood usage for all patients treated for gynecologic malignancies. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures are required, such as optimization of red blood cell mass, adequate preoperative plan and invasive hemostatic procedures, assisting anesthetic techniques, individualization of anemia tolerance, autologous blood donation, normovolemic hemodilution, intraoperative cell salvage and pharmacologic agents for controlling blood loss. An individualised management plan of experienced personnel adopting a multidisciplinary team approach should be available to establish non-blood management strategies, and not only on demand of the patient, in the field of gynecologic oncology with the use of drugs, devices and surgical-medical techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 9%
Turkey 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 27 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Psychology 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,139,782
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#437
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,714
of 141,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.