↓ Skip to main content

Machine learning classifiers provide insight into the relationship between microbial communities and bacterial vaginosis

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machine learning classifiers provide insight into the relationship between microbial communities and bacterial vaginosis
Published in
BioData Mining, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13040-015-0055-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Beck, James A. Foster

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a disease associated with the vagina microbiome. It is highly prevalent and is characterized by symptoms including odor, discharge and irritation. No single microbe has been found to cause BV. In this paper we use random forests and logistic regression classifiers to model the relationship between the microbial community and BV. We use subsets of the microbial community features in order to determine which features are important to the classification models. We find that models generated using logistic regression and random forests perform nearly identically and identify largely similar important features. Only a few features are necessary to obtain high BV classification accuracy. Additionally, there appears to be substantial redundancy between the microbial community features. These results are in contrast to a previous study in which the important features identified by the classifiers were dissimilar. This difference appears to be the result of using different feature importance measures. It is not clear whether machine learning classifiers are capturing patterns different from simple correlations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Computer Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,784,446
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#132
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,920
of 270,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.