↓ Skip to main content

Rwandan family medicine residents expanding their training into South Africa: the use of South-South medical electives in enhancing learning experiences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rwandan family medicine residents expanding their training into South Africa: the use of South-South medical electives in enhancing learning experiences
Published in
BMC Medical Education, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0405-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maaike Flinkenflögel, Gboyega Ogunbanjo, Vincent Kalumire Cubaka, Jan De Maeseneer

Abstract

International medical electives are well-accepted in medical education, with the flow of students generally being North-South. In this article we explore the learning outcomes of Rwandan family medicine residents who completed their final year elective in South Africa. We compare the learning outcomes of this South-South elective to those of North-South electives from the literature. In-depth interviews were conducted with Rwandan postgraduate family medicine residents who completed a 4-week elective in South Africa during their final year of training. The interviews were thematically analysed in an inductive way. The residents reported important learning outcomes in four overarching domains namely: medical, organisational, educational, and personal. The learning outcomes of the residents in this South-South elective had substantial similarities to findings in literature on learning outcomes of students from the North undertaking electives in the Southern hemisphere. Electives are a useful learning tool, both for Northern students, and students from universities in the South. A reciprocity-framework is needed to increase mutual benefits for Southern universities when students from the North come for electives. We suggest further research on the possibility of supporting South-South electives by Northern colleagues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 11%
Lecturer 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 20 28%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,288,585
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,139
of 3,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,873
of 264,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#40
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.