You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Outcomes of usual chiropractic, harm & efficacy, the ouch study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-235 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruce F Walker, Barrett Losco, Brenton R Clarke, Jeff Hebert, Simon French, Norman J Stomski |
Abstract |
Previous studies have demonstrated that adverse events occur during chiropractic treatment. However, because of these studies design we do not know the frequency and extent of these events when compared to sham treatment. The principal aims of this study are to establish the frequency and severity of adverse effects from short term usual chiropractic treatment of the spine when compared to a sham treatment group. The secondary aim of this study is to establish the efficacy of usual short term chiropractic care for spinal pain when compared to a sham intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
Sweden | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 5% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 25% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |