You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Closed Or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13017-018-0183-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Derek J. Roberts, Matti Tolonen, Jessica L. McKee, Ari Leppaniemi, Peter Faris, Christopher J. Doig, Fausto Catena, Timothy Fabian, Craig N. Jenne, Osvaldo Chiara, Paul Kubes, Braden Manns, Yoram Kluger, Gustavo P. Fraga, Bruno M. Pereira, Jose J. Diaz, Michael Sugrue, Ernest E. Moore, Jianan Ren, Chad G. Ball, Raul Coimbra, Zsolt J. Balogh, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Elijah Dixon, Walter Biffl, Anthony MacLean, Ian Ball, John Drover, Paul B. McBeth, Juan G. Posadas-Calleja, Neil G. Parry, Salomone Di Saverio, Carlos A. Ordonez, Jimmy Xiao, Massimo Sartelli, for The Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) after Source Control for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| Finland | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Romania | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 28% |
| Unknown | 65 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 82 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,110,685
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#71
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,479
of 346,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.