↓ Skip to main content

Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
Published in
Trials, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Copas, James J. Lewis, Jennifer A. Thompson, Calum Davey, Gianluca Baio, James R. Hargreaves

Abstract

There is limited guidance on the design of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials. Current methodological literature focuses mainly on trials with cross-sectional data collection at discrete times, yet many recent stepped wedge trials do not follow this design. In this article, we present a typology to characterise the full range of stepped wedge designs, and offer guidance on several other design aspects. We developed a framework to define and report the key characteristics of a stepped wedge trial, including cluster allocation and individual participation. We also considered the relative strengths and weaknesses of trials according to this framework. We classified recently published stepped wedge trials using this framework and identified illustrative case studies. We identified key design choices and developed guidance for each. We identified three main stepped wedge designs: those with a closed cohort, an open cohort, and a continuous recruitment short exposure design. In the first two designs, many individuals experience both control and intervention conditions. In the final design, individuals are recruited in continuous time as they become eligible and experience either the control or intervention condition, but not both, and then provide an outcome measurement at follow-up. While most stepped wedge trials use simple randomisation, stratification and restricted randomisation are often feasible and may be useful. Some recent studies collect outcome information from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period, but this contributes little to the primary analysis. Incomplete designs should be considered when the intervention cannot be implemented quickly. Carry-over effects can arise in stepped wedge trials with closed and open cohorts. Stepped wedge trial designs should be reported more clearly. Researchers should consider the use of stratified and/or restricted randomisation. Trials should generally not commit resources to collect outcome data from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period. Though substantial carry-over effects are uncommon in stepped wedge trials, researchers should consider their possibility before conducting a trial with closed or open cohorts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 291 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 15%
Student > Master 31 10%
Professor 19 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 68 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 29%
Social Sciences 26 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Psychology 16 5%
Mathematics 12 4%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 94 32%