You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantitative mitral valve anatomy and pathology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Echo Research & Practice, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1530/erp-15-0008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Madalina Garbi, Mark J. Monaghan |
Abstract |
Quantitative analysis is an important part of the morphological assessment of the diseased mitral valve. It can be used to describe valve anatomy, pathology, function and the mechanisms of disease. Echocardiography is the main source of indirect quantitative data that is comparable with direct anatomic or surgical measurements. Furthermore, it can relate morphology with function. This review provides an account of current mitral valve quantification techniques and clinical applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 16% |
Mexico | 5 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Italy | 2 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 18% |
Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 22% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 52% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,353,135
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#30
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,979
of 276,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them