↓ Skip to main content

Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 1,948)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
120 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
3 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tjeerd van der Ploeg, Peter C Austin, Ewout W Steyerberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 424 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 18%
Researcher 64 15%
Student > Master 59 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Other 33 8%
Other 77 18%
Unknown 77 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 25%
Computer Science 36 8%
Mathematics 30 7%
Engineering 24 6%
Psychology 19 4%
Other 97 23%
Unknown 113 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#391,731
of 22,096,435 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#32
of 1,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,241
of 253,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,096,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them