↓ Skip to main content

Sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care circulating Cathodic antigen test before and after praziquantel treatment in diagnosing Schistosoma mansoni infection in adult population co-infected with…

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care circulating Cathodic antigen test before and after praziquantel treatment in diagnosing Schistosoma mansoni infection in adult population co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1, North-Western Tanzania
Published in
Archives of Public Health, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13690-018-0274-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Humphrey D. Mazigo, Stella Kepha, Safari M. Kinung’hi

Abstract

The effect of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) on CD4+ Th2 cells is hypothesized to affect parasitological diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni using Kato Katz technique. Thus, the use of more sensitive technique such as Point-of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen (POC-CCA) test is recommended. However, the sensitivity of this diagnostic test in diagnosing S.mansoni infection and the usefulness of it in monitoring efficacy of praziquantel drug in presence of HIV-1 co-infection remains inconclusive. The Primary objective of the present study was to assess accuracy of the POC-CCA test in diagnosing S.mansoni infection before and after praziquantel treatment in adult population co-infected with HIV -1. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among individuals aged 15-55 years at Igalagala village, north-western Tanzania. At baseline and 4 weeks after treatment, a single stool and urine samples were collected from each participants. Kato Katz (KK) technique and Point-of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen tests were used for diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni. At baseline, based on KK and POC-CCA, the prevalence of S.mansoni was 57.8% (95%CI: 52.9-62.4) and 87.5% (95%CI: 83.9-90.4). Based on KK technique and POC-CCA test, 3.6% and 5.7% of the study participants were co-infected with S.mansoni and HIV-1. At baseline, in the general population, the sensitivities of POC-CCA test using KK technique and combine gold standard were 96.3%(95%CI: 93.1-98.3) and 97.6%(95%CI:95.5-98.9) respectively. In the HIV-1 seropositive group, at baseline, the sensitivities of POC-CCA test using KK technique and combined gold standards, were 93.3%(95%CI:68.1-99.8) and 96%(95CI%:79.6-99.9). Four weeks after treatment, in general population, the sensitivities of POC-CCA test using KK technique and combined gold standards were 47.8%(95%CI:26.8-69.4) and 84.4%(95%CI:74.4-91.7). In the HIV-1 seropositive group, using KK technique, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI:2.5-100). The sensitivity of POC-CCA in diagnosing S.mansoni infection was higher than KK technique in adult individuals likely to have low infection intensity and co-infected with HIV-1. However, its sensitivity decreases following praziquantel treatment but remained higher than Kato Katz technique. If the goal of the post-treatment is to identify uncured individuals, then POC-CCA test offers the best choice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,685,617
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#380
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,489
of 343,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.