↓ Skip to main content

Adjusting heterogeneous ascertainment bias for genetic association analysis with extended families

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjusting heterogeneous ascertainment bias for genetic association analysis with extended families
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12881-015-0198-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suyeon Park, Sungyoung Lee, Young Lee, Christine Herold, Basavaraj Hooli, Kristina Mullin, Taesung Park, Changsoon Park, Lars Bertram, Christoph Lange, Rudolph Tanzi, Sungho Won

Abstract

In family-based association analysis, each family is typically ascertained from a single proband, which renders the effects of ascertainment bias heterogeneous among family members. This is contrary to case-control studies, and may introduce sample or ascertainment bias. Statistical efficiency is affected by ascertainment bias, and careful adjustment can lead to substantial improvements in statistical power. However, genetic association analysis has often been conducted using family-based designs, without addressing the fact that each proband in a family has had a great influence on the probability for each family member to be affected. We propose a powerful and efficient statistic for genetic association analysis that considered the heterogeneity of ascertainment bias among family members, under the assumption that both prevalence and heritability of disease are available. With extensive simulation studies, we showed that the proposed method performed better than the existing methods, particularly for diseases with large heritability. We applied the proposed method to the genome-wide association analysis of Alzheimer's disease. Four significant associations with the proposed method were found. Our significant findings illustrated the practical importance of this new analysis method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#201
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,570
of 277,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.