↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0750-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten Cuypers, Romy E. D. Lamers, Paul J. M. Kil, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse, Marieke de Vries

Abstract

At an early stage, prostate cancer patients are often eligible for more than one treatment option, or may choose to defer curative treatment. Without a pre-existing superior option, a patient has to weigh his personal preferences against the risk and benefits of each alternative to select the most appropriate treatment. Given this context, in prostate cancer treatment decision-making, it is particularly suitable to follow the principles of shared decision making (SDM), especially with the support of specific instruments like decision aids (DAs). Although several alternatives are available, present tools are not sufficiently compatible with routine clinical practice. To overcome existing barriers and to stimulate structural implementation of DAs and SDM in clinical practice, a web-based prostate cancer treatment DA was developed to fit clinical workflow. Following the structure of an existing DA, Dutch content was developed, and values clarification methods (VCMs) were added. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of this DA on (shared) treatment choice and patient-reported outcomes. Nineteen Dutch hospitals are included in a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial, with an intervention and a control arm. In the intervention group, the DA will be offered after diagnosis, and a summary of the patients' preferences, which were identified with the DA, can be discussed by the patient and his clinician during later consultation. Patients in the control group will receive information and decisional support as usual. Results from both groups on decisional conflict, treatment choice and the experience with involvement in the decision-making process are compared. Patients are requested to fill in questionnaires after treatment decision-making but before treatment is started, and 6 and 12 months later. This will allow the development of treatment satisfaction, decisional regret, and quality of life to be monitored. Clinicians from both groups will evaluate their practice of information provision and decisional support. This study will describe a web-based prostate cancer treatment DA with VCMs. The effect of this DA on the decisionmaking process and subsequent patient reported outcomes will be evaluated. The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR4554 , registration date 1 May 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Psychology 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 8 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 47 29%