↓ Skip to main content

Do unfavourable working conditions explain mental health inequalities between ethnic groups?: cross-sectional data of the HELIUS study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do unfavourable working conditions explain mental health inequalities between ethnic groups?: cross-sectional data of the HELIUS study
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2107-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Aart H. Schene, Karien Stronks, Marieke B. Snijder, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen, Judith K Sluiter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Psychology 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,793,255
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,579
of 17,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,230
of 277,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#158
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.