↓ Skip to main content

Benefits for elders with vulnerable health from the Chronic Disease Self-management Program (CDSMP) at short and longer term

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits for elders with vulnerable health from the Chronic Disease Self-management Program (CDSMP) at short and longer term
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12877-015-0090-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angèle A. G. C. Jonker, Hannie C. Comijs, Kees C. P. M. Knipscheer, Dorly J. H. Deeg

Abstract

When health declines, older persons may benefit from an intervention program that strengthens their self-management and empowers them to keep in control of their own body and life. Therefore we conducted a Randomized Controlled Trial using the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) in a sample of 169 older persons in frail health and in need of elderly care. We assessed psychological coping resources and wellbeing, pre- and posttreatment and at 6-month follow-up, and investigated whether specific subgroups would benefit in particular from the intervention. The CDSMP appeared effective with respect to sense of mastery but only in the lower educated participants (p < .05). Furthermore, the intervention stabilized valuation of life in participants, whereas in the controls valuation of life decreased. The high appreciation score and low drop-out are indicative for the applicability of the CDSMP for this specific target group. We recommend integration of the ingredients of the program into the daily healthcare practice of professionals working with vulnerable older persons. This would involve professional guidance starting from interpersonal equality and emphasising a persons possibilities given their physical or cognitive limitations. This will help older vulnerable persons to focus on their own attainable goals and to experience being successful. The trial was registered in the Dutch Trial Register as NTR 1173 at 08-03-2008; 'Is selfmanagement benefical for well-being of average older persons?' http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=1173.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 30 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Psychology 11 9%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,930,725
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,946
of 3,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,838
of 269,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.