Title |
Global analysis of DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma by a liquid hybridization capture-based bisulfite sequencing approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Epigenetics, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13148-015-0121-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fei Gao, Huifang Liang, Hanlin Lu, Junwen Wang, Meng Xia, Zhimei Yuan, Yu Yao, Tong Wang, Xiaolong Tan, Arian Laurence, Hua Xu, Jingjing Yu, Wei Xiao, Wei Chen, Ming Zhou, Xiuqing Zhang, Qian Chen, Xiaoping Chen |
Abstract |
Epigenetic alterations, such as aberrant DNA methylation of promoter and enhancer regions, which lead to atypical gene expression, have been associated with carcinogenesis. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), genome-wide analysis of methylation has only recently been used. For a better understanding of hepatocarcinogenesis, we applied an even higher resolution analysis of the promoter methylome to identify previously unknown regions and genes differentially methylated in HCC. Optimized liquid hybridization capture-based bisulfite sequencing (LHC-BS) was developed to quantitatively analyze 1.86 million CpG sites in individual samples from eight pairs of HCC and adjacent tissues. By linking the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in promoters to the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we identified 12 DMR-associated genes. We further utilized Illumina MiSeq combining the bisulfite sequencing PCR approach to validate the 12 candidate genes. Analysis of an additional 78 HCC pairs on the Illumina MiSeq platform confirmed that 7 genes showed either promoter hyper-methylation (SMAD6, IFITM1, LRRC4, CHST4, and TBX15) or hypo-methylation (CCL20 and NQO1) in HCC. Novel methylome profiling provides a cost-efficient approach to identifying candidate genes in human HCC that may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis. Our work provides further information critical for understanding the epigenetic processes underlying tumorigenesis and development of HCC. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Brazil | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |