You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dark chocolate and reduced snack consumption in mildly hypertensive adults: an intervention study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-015-0075-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raika Koli, Klaus Köhler, Elina Tonteri, Juha Peltonen, Heikki Tikkanen, Mikael Fogelholm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 9% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 201 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 21% |
Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
Researcher | 15 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 23% |
Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 11% |
Unknown | 60 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,872,065
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#464
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,464
of 266,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.