↓ Skip to main content

A cross sectional study between the prevalence of chronic pain and academic pressure in adolescents in China (Shanghai)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross sectional study between the prevalence of chronic pain and academic pressure in adolescents in China (Shanghai)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12891-015-0625-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongxing Zhang, Guoying Deng, Zhiqing Zhang, Qian Zhou, Xiang Gao, Liqing Di, Qianzi Che, Xiaoyu Du, Yun Cai, Xuedong Han, Qinghua Zhao

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of four types of chronic pain (headache, abdominal pain, neck and shoulder pain (NSP), and low back pain (LBP)) and to explore the relationship between the prevalence of chronic pain and self-reported academic pressure in high school students in Shanghai, China. Three thousand students were randomly surveyed on related issues using a questionnaire, and the results were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Among the 2849 high school students who completed the questionnaire, the overall prevalence rates of headache, abdominal pain, NSP, and LBP were 30.3, 20.9, 32.8, and 41.1 %, respectively. The students in general experienced a heavy burden of learning, a high level of stress, and sleep deprivation, which were closely related to the four types of chronic pain. Chronic pain is a common condition in Chinese adolescents and is closely related to self-reported academic pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 157 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 21%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 44 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,079,473
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,128
of 4,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,053
of 266,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.