↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and correlates of contraceptive use among female adolescents in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
586 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and correlates of contraceptive use among female adolescents in Ghana
Published in
BMC Women's Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12905-015-0221-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel H. Nyarko

Abstract

Adolescence is a critical stage in the life course and evidence suggests that even though contraceptive use has been steadily increasing among women in Ghana over the past years, contraceptive prevalence and determinants among female adolescents is quite lacking. This paper examines the prevalence and correlates of contraceptive use among female adolescents in Ghana. The paper used data from the 2008 Ghana Demographic and Health survey. Bivariate analysis was carried out to determine the contraceptive prevalence among female adolescents while logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the correlates of female adolescent contraceptive use. The study founded that female adolescent contraceptive use was significantly determined by age of adolescent, education, work status, knowledge of ovulatory cycle, visit of health facility and marital status. This has implications for adolescent sexual and reproductive health programmes in Ghana. It is therefore essential to intensify girl child education and strengthen the provision of family planning information and services for female adolescents in the country.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 586 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 581 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 21%
Student > Bachelor 112 19%
Student > Postgraduate 35 6%
Lecturer 34 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 5%
Other 63 11%
Unknown 188 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 156 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 100 17%
Social Sciences 61 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 49 8%
Unknown 197 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,187,344
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#347
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,431
of 267,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.