The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of shoe heel height on vastus medialis and vastus lateralis electromyographic activity during sit to stand
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-799x-3-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lindsay Edwards, John Dixon, Jillian R Kent, David Hodgson, Vicki J Whittaker |
Abstract |
It has been proposed that high-heeled shoes may contribute to the development and progression of knee pain. However, surprisingly little research has been carried out on how shoe heel height affects muscle activity around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of differing heel height on the electromyographic (EMG) activity in vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) during a sit to stand activity. This was an exploratory study to inform future research. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 22% |
Student > Master | 18 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 29% |
Sports and Recreations | 12 | 13% |
Engineering | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#642
of 1,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,260
of 156,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.