↓ Skip to main content

Jaw tremor: a manifestation of vascular parkinsonism? - a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Jaw tremor: a manifestation of vascular parkinsonism? - a case report
Published in
BMC Neurology, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12883-018-1093-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thilini B. Udagedara, Inuka Kishara Gooneratne

Abstract

Vascular Parkinsonism (VP) is a heterogeneous group of conditions that manifest clinically in parkinsonian features, but are presumably of vascular cause. It is usually bilateral, non-tremulous, and frequently associated with pyramidal signs. Classically VP is described as lower body parkinsonism affecting predominantly the legs. A 67 years old lady presented with a history of acute onset jaw tremor, with tremor predominantly in both upper limbs. Neurological examination revealed hypomimia of the face with cogwheel rigidity and bradykinesia bilaterally, predominantly in the upper limbs without pyramidal signs. She had a marked tremor of the jaw at rest. When she was asked to open her mouth the tremor was re-emergent. Non contrast CT scan of her brain revealed an infarction in the region of putamen on the left with no evidence of diffuse subcortical white matter ischemia or extension to the caudate nucleus. She was treated with levodopa and responded well to medication. This case describes atypical clinical features which could be associated with VP including jaw tremor. This case also stresses the importance of initiating a trial of levodopa as certain patients may respond well to medication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Psychology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,523,725
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#2,166
of 2,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,007
of 328,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.