You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new combined strategy to implement a community occupational therapy intervention: designing a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-11-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carola ME Döpp, Maud JL Graff, Steven Teerenstra, Eddy Adang, Ria WG Nijhuis - van der Sanden, Marcel GM OldeRikkert, Myrra JFJ Vernooij-Dassen |
| Abstract |
Even effective interventions for people with dementia and their caregivers require specific implementation efforts. A pilot study showed that the highly effective community occupational therapy in dementia (COTiD) program was not implemented optimally due to various barriers. To decrease these barriers and make implementation of the program more effective a combined implementation (CI) strategy was developed. In our study we will compare the effectiveness of this CI strategy with the usual educational (ED) strategy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 133% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 108 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Librarian | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 18% |
| Psychology | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#12,559,706
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,793
of 3,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,335
of 108,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.